Jump to content

Talk:VIA C4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"One criticized more than one once VIA..." I'd edit this but I'm not sure what you're trying to say.. pomegranate 22:57, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to merge with VIA C3 --Lox (t,c) 20:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The C4 was never released - it was a planned clone of the P4 that got cancelled, because the high clock speed methodology became discredited, due to thermal issues. VIA found small, cheap, low power, a more marketable proposition. Merge to VIA_C3 which alreayd covers this matter. Timharwoodx 10:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.