Jump to content

Category talk:Photography museums and galleries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archival discussion moved from Wikipedia:Categories for Deletion

[edit]

Unnecessary subcategory—most art museums include different media, and I don't believe there are too many that cater just to photography. They can all just be included in the proper country subcategory of Category:Art galleries and museums without anything really being lost, unless we also want Category:Painting museums, Category:Sculpture museums... Postdlf 02:23, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Photography Museums:

  1. The National Museum of Photograpy, Film, and Television
  2. George Eastman House
  3. Canadian Museum of Contemporary Photography
  4. Latvian Museum of Photography
  5. California Museum of Photography
  6. International Center of Photography
  7. Photography Museum Antwerp
  8. The museum of Photographic Arts

How many would you like?  ;)

Oh, and sculpture museums:

  1. Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum
  2. Richard W. Bock Sculpture Museum
  3. Amber Sculpture Museum (Lithuania)
  4. Miaoli Wood Sculpture Exhibition Center
  5. Umlauf Sculpture Garden & Museum

--Samuel J. Howard 09:35, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)

  • Yes, but how many of those have articles at this time? -- Graham ☺ | Talk 10:29, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
    • I don't know, but the policy as I understand it is generally not to delete categories that are proper categories but simply not populated yet.--Samuel J. Howard 03:50, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Hmm... I've changed my mind from delete to keep, though I would like to see it limited to museums devoted to photography. MOMA was included, but is not a "photography museum"—it's a museum that includes photography. I see a difference in this, and I also would like to keep the articles on such large and broad museums uncluttered by a dozen categories representing every medium of art that they include in their collections. Postdlf 01:08, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Perhaps the most useful, at least from the perspective of a photographic researcher is Museums with signifigant Photographic Collections Rpd9803 (talk) 00:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]