User talk:Acntx

Archives

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Replaceable fair use Image:Mutharika.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mutharika.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Martin H. (talk) 07:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Category:Wilmington metropolitan area to Category:Cape Fear region

You may find my rename request here. I saw it fitting to rename the category along with the article since the merging. Since you created the category in the first place, I thought I'd let you know. --Triadian (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Chiluba.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Chiluba.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your new category

Regarding Category:Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown metropolitan area, I think it might be easier from a categorization standpoint if you just put Category:Communities in Orange County, New York in that one as a subcategory, since the MSA includes the whole county (Is Ulster in it too? If so, a long time ago I also created Category:Communities in Ulster County, New York to depopulate the county cat there, and that would go in as well.

As for Dutchess, the county-level cat is not full enough yet to depopulate that way but there are already a number of community-specific categories in it that you could put in as subcats until we (well, since I'm the person primarily responsible for it, I) decide to have a "Communities in Dutchess County, New York" category.

Ideally, I think, the MSA category would have no other categories in it, and you could probably better serve the navigational function by creating a list article, "Communities in the Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown metropolitan area" for WP:HVNY, and then linking to it from the "see also" section.

The reason I suggest this is that creating a category that by definition includes articles on all the settlements already categorized under two or three counties and nothing more would probably fail a CFD as mostly overlapping (Categorizing the categories that way though would, I think, be OK). The information is hardly trivial and definitely useful, but I think a category in each article is a little too much. (There's also a line for this in both the regular city infobox and the geobox variant (which I like more). Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Oh, you already have an article on the MSA. OK. I added that to the HV project. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dileita.png

i will not spam your talk with non-free fair use deletion warnings: The image for Dileita Mohamed Dileita is replaced by a free image, see also commons:Category:Dileita Mohamed Dileita. Time for the fair-use image to go per speedy deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gnassingbe Eyadema.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gnassingbe Eyadema.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CFD for Category:Columbus, Ohio suburbs

After seeing you working on Category:Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area, I thought it would be best to merge the suburbs category there. Please pop by the CFD if you have any comments. Postdlf (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panther Creek High School

This disambiguation page seems unnecessary. The Texas high school with shares this name with the North Carolina one has no article.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion, please

I've suggested renaming Category:Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Census Area, Alaska to Category:Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, Alaska, but although I listed it several days ago, I've received absolutely no comments either way. Would you please participate? Nyttend (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lima-VanWert-WapakonetaCSA.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Lima-VanWert-WapakonetaCSA.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 05:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abdallah Ali Abdallah

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abdallah Ali Abdallah, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

winning 0.11 percent of an election doth not notability make

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 10:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simai Abdulrahman Abdallah

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Simai Abdulrahman Abdallah, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

0.10 percent of the vote doth not a notable person make

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Reconstruction Alliance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Reconstruction Alliance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable organisation; fielding one candidate who won 0.10 percent of the vote doesn't make notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Liberia Bomi.png

File:Liberia Bomi.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Liberia-Bomi-new.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Liberia-Bomi-new.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoktarOuldDaddah.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MoktarOuldDaddah.jpeg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image creation

I am creating an article on Bond, Mississippi after seeing the red link on Perkinston, Mississippi. I saw that you made a red-dot on a map for Perkinston, and I'm wondering if you could do the same for Bond. The file I'm talking about is this. Thank you. Mm40 (talk) 11:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. It's not a very impressive article, so it needs all it can get. Will you post it, or should I? Mm40 (talk) 00:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Handbook

Don't look at me as the person from whom you must get permission :-) In my opinion, it would be reasonable to say that the Handbook listed that as the population: whether or not the Handbook is reliable for population, it's quite obvious that this statement is true. Nyttend (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Totally unrelated to community populations...

Since you describe yourself as a history buff, if you have access to a camera, would you be willing/able to get pictures for sites on the National Register of Historic Places in Texas? Nyttend (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mumford, Texas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mumford, Texas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable unincorporated community. Completely unsourced.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wellborn, Texas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wellborn, Texas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable unincorporated community. A few minor mentions in local sources (which are therefore non-thirdparty) is not enough to meet WP:N, and its lack of status as a city or town does not make it "automatically" notable. Its having a zipcode also does not make it notable, many unincorporated communities and suburbs do.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wellborn, Texas

I have nominated Wellborn, Texas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellborn, Texas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mumford, Texas

I have nominated Mumford, Texas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumford, Texas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job

Hello, I liked your work on the Birome, Texas article. You were really good on adding external links! --Lickitung comma Teh (Speak) 19:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US Census Population

I noticed on the edit you made to Texola, Oklahoma you were able to find the US Census information for the town from 1910 to 2000. I was wondering where you were able to find this information. I've been looking for a good source of Census information to track the change in population of towns but haven't found very much yet.Narthring (talk • contribs) 19:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use of Handbook of Texas

My taxes pay for it. Why shouldn't we be able to cite information from the Handbook, with proper references? Creton4 (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Malam_Bacai_Sanha.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Malam_Bacai_Sanha.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Old Glory, Texas

On August 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Old Glory, Texas, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 08:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Clark County, Ohio

Just curious, why do you think that the Springfield metropolitan area needs to have a separate article? I'm not going to revert you or anything like that; I'm just curious why it doesn't get redirected to the county article, like with most single-county census statistical areas. Nyttend (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zanzibari heads of government

Hi, I noticed you did most of the work for the List of heads of government of Zanzibar. But I disagree with the title; strictly speaking (i.e. according to both the Zanzibar and Tanzanian constitutions) the President of Zanzibar is the head of government. The Chief minister is appointed by the president to run day-to-day things. Also, the list is short enough to be included in an article, so I was considered moving this list to Chief minister of Zanzibar, and adding some more information there. What do you think? Mlm42 (talk) 21:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panola, Texas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Panola, Texas, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.panolacountytexas.us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Panola, Texas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. MLauba (talk) 10:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Striking this, I apparenly have used the wrong warning. This was meant for copyvio problems. That being said, Willow City, Texas again contains sentences lifted wholesale from the Handbook of Texas Online, and I find it more difficult to leave credence to your denials on Panola, Texas. MLauba (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Salva Kiir.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salva Kiir.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 20:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Willow City, Texas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Willow City, Texas, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/WW/hnw51.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

Considering your statement on my talk page, I am a bit surprised to find yet again multiple sentences copied verbatim from the Handbook of Texas in Willow City, Texas. I just realized I completely screwed up the warning I put up here earlier, and fully understand now why a warning for edit warring might have sounded bewildering. I apologize for that.

However, I believe that you may be misunderstanding when using direct quotes from a copyrighted source is permissible and appropriate on Wikipedia. Quotes can be used, extremely sparingly, to illustrate a specific point, for instance, if someone famous had visited Willow City and wrote a statement about it, quoting and attributing it to that person would possibly be a legitimate use.

Building the descriptive part of the article, in this case the history section, on sentences lifted wholesale is however not a legitimate use. WP:Quotations has more lengthy explanations of how and when you can use quoted material.

That being said, I also have to add a more formal part to this message. I do not doubt you acted in good faith so far, and that such copying has not been done out of malice. You are more than welcome to bring any questions to me, or more widely, at WT:CP for instance. But if this happens again in the future, your editing privileges will have to be removed. Which would be a shame. MLauba (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just stick to stubs since my work is no longer good enough. This way I want be accused of doing anything wrong. My work over the past five years on Wikipedia has been without major problems until now. --Acntx (talk) 19:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hobson, Texas

Hi. The history section of Hobson, Texas will need rewriting, as it contains text copied and very closely paraphrased from two sources. I have put specifics on the article's talk page. Just to provide a single example here, your sentence, "It was possibly named Castine because of its early settlers were of French descent and for its elevation; it was referred to as 'French Heights' in the early records of Karnes County" differs from the one used at your source only by the addition of the words "of" and "early". This is not permitted under Wikipedia's copyright policies.I'm afraid that we are not able to use previously published text without completely rewriting it in our words unless it is public domain or compatibly licensed with CC-By-SA. While we can incorporate a few brief, clearly marked quotations from copyrighted sources in accordance with WP:NFC, we can't simply copy from our sources, even with some minimal arrangement.

I have blanked the section with the copyright template and listed the article at the copyright problem board to give you time either to rewrite this completely in your own language or to verify permission. See donating copyrighted materials. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all of the content from this page except for the first two sentences so I will no longer be accused of copyright infringement. I can't believe how my work is being singled-out today. --Acntx (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Once a copyright problem is detected, it's necessary to look to see if other issues exist. If you have not understood that you could not place content from other sources on Wikipedia without verifying permission, I'm afraid there's a chance that you may have placed content in other articles that will need to be repaired. This isn't personal, but essential to protect the project from potential legal liability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If a copyright issue is found with any other pages that I have created, I don't want to even waste my time trying to fix it just to run the possibility of being back in this situation again. As I also said on the Hobson, Texas talk page, Its nothing you said, I am just frustrated that this keeps happening, especially after I have spent months creating these articles with no copyright issues having ever been raised. --Acntx (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Have you changed your approach to reusing text? If not, it's possible that there are older issues that were not noticed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think that anything changed, but I'll go back and re-examine them. --Acntx (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

←That could be helpful, thanks. I've only been able to glance at your back catalog, but it's obvious that you've put a lot of time and effort and good improvements into Wikipedia. I'm sure that it is frustrating and dismaying to suddenly have something like this pop up. We just need to figure out if there are other articles that are likely to be a problem, so we can address those, and to be sure that you've got a good understanding of copyright policy going forward. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've cooled down now and apologize if I sounded combative earlier. I will try my hardest to create articles that are acceptable and meet all necessary guidelines. --Acntx (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Lancaster ISD

Hi! Many of the school articles of Lancaster ISD may need to be consolidated into the main district article. I may get to work on it at some point later. WhisperToMe (talk) 10:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seychelles district maps

Hi friend, nice work you did on the Seychelles district maps. However I believe three of them are wrong: File:SC-Mont Fleuri.png File:SC-Les Mamelles.png File:SC-Roche Caiman.png. Sainte Anne Islands and the other islands of the Sainte Anne Marine National Park are not Mamelles District, they belong to Mont Fleuri District instead. Mammelles District is the interior part of what you show as Roche Caiman District. This is what I gather from here and there and other sources. I am looking forward to your corrections. Greetings, --Ratzer (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But please keep the current version of File:SC-Les Mamelles.png and rename it File:Ste. Anne Marine National Park.png for use in that article, because it exactly highlights the islands of that marine park. Greetings--Ratzer (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just updated the Seychelles maps. If anything else needs to be changed, just let me know. Thanks. --Acntx (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Excellent, that all looks very good now. Thank you. Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Acntx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 118 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 34 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gabriel Costa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Evaristo Carvalho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Raul Bragança Neto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Armindo Vaz d'Almeida - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Norberto Costa Alegre - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maria do Carmo Silveira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Daniel Daio - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Celestino Rocha da Costa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hamada Madi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
François Ngeze - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Frédéric Bamvuginyumvira 12. Mathias Sinamenye 13. Anatole Kanyenkiko 14. Édouard Nzambimana 15. Epitace Bayaganakandi 16. Balthazar Bigirimana 17. Jean Minani 18. Frédéric Ngenzebuhoro 19. Seif Shariff Hamad 20. Immaculée Nahayo 21. George Boley 22. Roosevelt Johnson 23. Mohamed Gharib Bilali 24. Ramadani Baki 25. Constantino Teixeira 26. Mohamed Said Fazul 27. Freeman Mbowe 28. Bola Tinubu 29. Bukar Ibrahim 30. Jolly Nyame 31. Ahmed Makarfi 32. Adamu Aliero 33. Mariam Omar 34. Haji Mussa Kitole 35. Olusegun Agagu 36. David Gbala 37. Eddington Varmah 38. Freddie Blay 39. Malik Yakubu 40. Felix Owusu-Adjapong 41. Toubé Clément Dakio 42. Pargui Emile Paré 43. Laurent Bado 44. Ram Ouédraogo 45. Philippe Ouédraogo 46. Ali Lankoandé 47. Hermann Yaméogo 48. Ibrahim Lipumba 49. Anna Senkoro 50. Leonard Shayo 51. Sengondo Mvungi 52. Paul Henry Kyara 53. Dionísio Tomé Dias 54. Abdou Soulé Elbak 55. Gualberto do Rosário 56. Habib Thiam 57. Abed Bwanika 58. Salmin Amour 59. Gabriel Koyambounou 60. Édouard Frank 61. Jean-Pierre Lebouder 62. Henri Maïdou 63. Leonel Mário d'Alva 64. Wesley Momo Johnson 65. Bennie Dee Warner 66. Oziel Hlalele Motaung 67. Malebaka Flory Bulane 68. Letuka Nkole 69. Thabang Nyeoe 70. Khauhelo Deborah Raditapole 71. Lovenes Gondwe 72. Steven Malamba 73. Ama Benyiwa-Doe 74. Andrews Adjei-Yeboah 75. Derek Hugh Taylor 76. Bertrand Osborne 77. Percival Austin Bramble 78. Hubert Hughes 79. Emile Gumbs 80. Ronald Webster 81. Washington Misick 82. Oswald Skippings 83. Norman Saunders (politician) 84. Ariel Misick 85. Carlos Simons 86. Emmanuel Misick 87. Clement Howell 88. Sandra Pierantozzi 89. Imata Kabua 90. Emmanuel Bodjollé 91. Paul Shabangu 92. Jameson Mbilini Dlamini 93. Andreas Fakudze 94. Obed Dlamini 95. Sotsha Dlamini 96. Mabandla Dlamini 97. Ben Nsibandze 98. Moses Mathendele Dlamini 99. Hae Phoofolo 100. Elias Phisoana Ramaema 101. Malimba Masheke 102. Dismas Nsengiyaremye 103. Sylvestre Nsanzimana 104. Randolph Beazer 105. Hilbourne Frank 106. Truman Bodden 107. Anushavan Danielyan 108. Francisco da Silva 109. Giorgos Lillikas 110. João Paulo Cassandra 111. Mateus Meira Rita 112. Maria Tebús 113. Kennedy Simmonds 114. Simeon Daniel 115. Nilo Guimarães 116. José Cassandra 117. David Payton 118. Mohamed Abdoulwahab

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Farhat

The article David Farhat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability has not been established. This person was never elected to any office.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onthegogo (talk) 22:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Farhat

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is David Farhat. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Farhat. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Roland Massaquoi

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Roland Massaquoi. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Massaquoi. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notify the uploader with:

Replaceable fair use File:Miguel Trovoada.png

Thanks for uploading File:Miguel Trovoada.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NBS (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Margaret Tor-Thompson

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Margaret Tor-Thompson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Tor-Thompson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alfred Reeves

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alfred Reeves. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Reeves. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

maps of Guinea Bissau

Hi Acntx, if I'm not mistaken, you are the creator of this map of Guinea Bissao, and possibly others. May I ask you what source you used to draw the region boundaries? On your map, the Bolana Region includes a piece of the mainland. The current official map, however, allocates this piece of land to neighboring Quinara Region. Possible, the border has changed recently. In this case, may I ask you to update your map(s)?--Ratzer (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I made this map back in 2005 and honestly don't remember where I obtained it from. I originally uploaded the image to Wikipedia and it has since been modified by others and moved to the Commons. I looked at the links you provided and I noticed the difference. I am unsure if any boundary changes have taken place since then, but I did check this site, which is pretty up to date on subdivision changes across the world. It states that the last boundary change in Guinea-Bissau occurred in 1990.

The following links are to several maps of Guinea-Bissau's regions. All of them show the mainland piece as belonging to the Bolama Region.

World Gazetteer: Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau - Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection, University of Texas
La carte de la Guinée Bissau – IZF.net (in French)
Guinea-Bissau – United Nations map

I'm really torn over whether the map should be replaced because the source you provided does come from a Guinea-Bissau government agency, but no other source that I have been able to locate shows that change. If after reading this message and reviewing the links, you think the map should be updated, I'll upload a new image to the Commons. Just let me know. Thanks. --Acntx (talk) 20:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm also not certain anymore which version is correct and current. The statoids page on sectors of Guinea-Bissau does note some changes on the sector level in 2004 and 2007, whereby the Bolama region is affected by the splitting of Uno sector from Caravelo sector, but it is silent about a possible change regarding the (former?) mainland portion of Bolama region. On the other hand, two maps produced by user Rarelibra in September of 2006 shows the mainland pice in Quinara region, while at the same time the first one (the Bolama sector map) does not reflect the 2004 splitting of Uno sector. If I find out more about the current situation, I shall report it here.--Ratzer (talk) 16:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent an e-mail to the statistical office of Guinea-Bissau at inec@mail.gtelecom.gw: ...may I ask you kindly about information whether the coastal strip around the town of São João belongs to Bolama region or to Quinara region. Has there been any change in that matter recently? I even got it translated to Portugese with Babelfish. Let's see if they answer.--Ratzer (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope they respond as well. Its a very confusing situation. Keep me informed and sorry for the delayed response. --Acntx (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I already received two warning messages that the mail could not be delivered: "The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect" (which probably means that the domain doesn't have up-to-date MX records or is otherwise misconfigured, or is experiencing temporary networking problems, not surprising in a poor country with little and fragile infrastructure). But I also wrote a mail to Gwillim Law, who runs the Statoids page, and asked him if he has any information on that matter. Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:KM-Grande Comore-Koimbani.png

Thank you for uploading File:KM-Grande Comore-Koimbani.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Congo CrisisMap.png

You're the uploader of the flag above. Can you add some sources you used to create it. For me it seems much simplyfied, because in that time nor the central nor the rebel governments had real control over their territory, so is not the best way the colorize the provinces. Also important is a date, because the territorys changed rapidly.--Antemister (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for the delayed response. I wanted to let you know that I updated the file with sources and a link to the original image that the map is based on. Thanks. --Acntx (talk) 23:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bukar Ibrahim.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bukar Ibrahim.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request

Hey Acntx! Do you mind if I submit some photo requests to you?

I need photos of Wilmer Hutchins ISD facilities. Particularly the admin building at 3820 East Illinois Avenue. It still has its WHISD markers up. If you are fine with the request, I'll post addresses of the other WHISD buildings.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Buyoya.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Buyoya.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Buyoya.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Buyoya.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dhlakama.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Dhlakama.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fernando Pereira.png

Thank you for uploading File:Fernando Pereira.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ahidjo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ahidjo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States communities with Asian American majority populations

Category:United States communities with Asian American majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States communities with Hispanic majority populations

Category:United States communities with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States counties with Hispanic majority populations

Category:United States counties with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:United States communities with Native American majority populations

Category:United States communities with Native American majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Albemarle County

Hello! WikiProject Albemarle County, an outreach effort supporting development of Albemarle County and surrounding area related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been started. As a user who has shown an interest in related topics I wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the project. If you are interested please visit our page (currently under construction) and add the user badge to your talk page. Thank you!!!

- WikiManOne (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Opportunity to comment on Batavia

There is a discussion starting up at Talk:Batavia (disambiguation), that may be of interest to you. The subject is technically a page move discussion, but the purpose of the discussion is to decide where Batavia should redirect. Until earlier today, Batavia redirected to History of Jakarta, but during this discussion, it is redirecting to Batavia (disambiguation). Your comments and suggestions are welcome.

Thanks for your help. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this because you are one of the principal editors of one of the articles that is linked to Batavia (disambiguation). This notice is being posted to all of the top three editors of each of these articles (in terms of total edits), with the following exceptions:

editors who are blocked
anonymous IP editors
editors who, despite ranking in the top three of edits to an article, have only a single edit to said article

This is an attempt to be a neutrally-phrased posting in keeping with the principles of WP:CANVASS. If you find anything in the wording or the manner posted to be a violation of that guideline, please notify me at my talk page.

Photo requests

Hey Acntx,

Are you still interested in doing the WHISD admin building photo request?

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 03:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siaka Stevens.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siaka Stevens.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mwambutsa.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mwambutsa.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ndadaye.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ndadaye.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeSoto logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeSoto logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Silveira.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Silveira.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ntibantunganya.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ntibantunganya.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:NtareV.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NtareV.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"A very small portion of Altamonte Springs extends into Orange County"

Where is this? It doesn't appear in Orange County's GIS data or the 2010 census maps. --NE2 22:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MZ-Angoche.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MZ-Angoche.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:YT-Acoua.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:YT-Acoua.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GA-Bakoumba.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GA-Bakoumba.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SeretseKhama.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SeretseKhama.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sekou Conneh.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sekou Conneh.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mamboundou.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mamboundou.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MoussavouKing.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MoussavouKing.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Minyardlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Minyardlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Myboto.png

Thanks for uploading File:Myboto.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tokelauan self-determination referendum, 2006

Template:Tokelauan self-determination referendum, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –aʙᴊıᴋʟaᴍ[ᴛ|ᴄ] 11:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:San Antonio metropolitan area

Category:San Antonio metropolitan area, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Greenville, South Carolina metropolitan area

Category:Greenville, South Carolina metropolitan area, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Evansville metropolitan area

Category:Evansville metropolitan area, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LancasterHS-TigerMascot.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LancasterHS-TigerMascot.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria do Carmo Silveira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria do Carmo Silveira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria do Carmo Silveira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 21:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I'm not sure if anyone has thanked you for this, but I just wanted to say a massive thanks for creating the African Elections Database. It's a brilliant resource, and quite possibly the best record anywhere (including academic books) of African elections. Number 5 7 20:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS, just in case you ever plan to start updating it, I came across some pre-independence elections in the Portuguese colonies and had a source for the figures. See Portuguese Guinea Legislative Assembly election, 1973 as one example (the rest are all in here). Cheers, Number 5 7 20:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Somaliland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of cities in Somaliland. Since you had some involvement with the List of cities in Somaliland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Vice President of Ghana

An article that you have been involved in editing, Vice President of Ghana, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. →Enock4seth ^(talk) 14:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jackson metropolitan area

Category:Jackson metropolitan area, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 04:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Malamba

The article Steven Malamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 09:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rally of the Ecologists of Burkina

The article Rally of the Ecologists of Burkina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cites no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Acntx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Population table for Richland, Texas in Navarro County.

I updated the population info to the 2010 number. I did the same for Rice. The historical population table you added to the page caught my eye. The numbers did not look right. ^[1] hows the 2000 population as 291. Your table has it at 798. ^[2] also show the 2000 pop. at 291 and also has the 1990 pop. as 244 (the table has it at 564). I could not find the correct numbers for the other years. It looks like you mistakingly put the Rice, Texas numbers on the Richland, Texas page. I figure you'd want to correct this. If not, can you tell me where you got your numbers and I'll correct it.Jdtrue63 (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the population figures for Richland after viewing decennial Census Reports dating back to 1930. -Acntx (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenville metropolitan area, South Carolina

The article Greenville metropolitan area, South Carolina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of Upstate South Carolina

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928^Talk 03:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dar es Salaam Region

The article Dar es Salaam Region has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Party for the Reconstruction of the Burundian Nation in Community Development

The article Party for the Reconstruction of the Burundian Nation in Community Development has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It fails WP:ORGDEPTH. After a fair amount of searching for WP:RS under the party's names and initials in both French and English, all I found were brief mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 04:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parishes of Montserrat

Template:Parishes of Montserrat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lesotho parliamentary election, 2007

Template:Lesotho parliamentary election, 2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Texas gubernatorial election, 2002

Template:Texas gubernatorial election, 2002 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Texas party primaries, 2002

Template:Texas party primaries, 2002 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Acntx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Locator Map Kaduna-Nigeria.png

The file File:Locator Map Kaduna-Nigeria.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Generation Hope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Generation Hope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Hope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Acntx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Acntx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hinds County school district map may need to be revised?

Hi, Acntx:

From "SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE MAP (2010 CENSUS): Hinds County, MS." U.S. Census Bureau.

It seems like File:HindsCounty-JacksonPublicSD.png may need to be revised?

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 02:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeretseKhama.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeretseKhama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:British Honduras legislative election, 1954

Template:British Honduras legislative election, 1954 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sammarinese parliamentary election, 2006

Template:Sammarinese parliamentary election, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nevis Island Assembly election, 2006

Template:Nevis Island Assembly election, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 12:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucas Rockwood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Rockwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Rockwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mamadú Iaia Djaló for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamadú Iaia Djaló is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamadú Iaia Djaló until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose necktie (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valera, Texas

A tag has been placed on Valera, Texas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not enough information on page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

ITN recognition for Yawovi Agboyibo

On 2 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yawovi Agboyibo, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Pierre Nkurunziza

On 10 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pierre Nkurunziza, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ntaryamira.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ntaryamira.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adamu Mu'azu

The article Adamu Mu'azu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Throckmorton ISD

In 2018, the school district changed names. I've updated the name to Throckmorton Collegiate Independent School District and updated the name on incoming article pages, but the school district page and high school's pages may be out of date in other ways.

I have not renamed the high school page. It's unclear if there is now one high school, named "Throckmorton Collegiate High School", or if there are two, that one and the Early College High School[1]. My best guess is that the "Early College High School" is either a program within the high school or a "school within a school" similar to some magnet schools that share a campus and some classes with a "neighborhood" non-magnet school. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Valdez–Cordova Census Area, Alaska

Template:Valdez–Cordova Census Area, Alaska has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 08:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Barbadian presidential elections

Template:Barbadian presidential elections has been nominated for merging with Template:Barbadian elections. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smyer Independent School District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smyer Independent School District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smyer Independent School District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milton Margai.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milton Margai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milton Margai.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milton Margai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sefate Democratic Union for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sefate Democratic Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sefate Democratic Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeSoto AAClogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeSoto AAClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Sasstown District

The article Sasstown District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references have been added since 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toad40 (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of San Elizario Independent School District

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on San Elizario Independent School District, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WPscatter ^t/_c 18:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matsanga

The article Matsanga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a small cluster of dwellings. No indication of notability, no sources found and no obvious redirect target.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of San Elizario Independent School District

The article San Elizario Independent School District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources to demonstrate notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nayabtigungu Congo Kaboré

The article Nayabtigungu Congo Kaboré has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Poughkeepsie–Newburgh–Middletown metropolitan area has been nominated for renaming

Category:Poughkeepsie–Newburgh–Middletown metropolitan area has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Traverse City micropolitan area

A tag has been placed on Category:Traverse City micropolitan area indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Best Southwest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Best Southwest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Southwest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your addition to Cherokee, Texas has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases, especially if they are not attributed to their source, may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Party for National Concord – Abasangirajambo

The article Party for National Concord – Abasangirajambo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No refrences. No addidtional information but that they're a "small political party in Burundi". No House or Senate Seats. This article has been edited once in the last ten years. Also there have been 5 views in the last year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.tsl.texas.gov/ref/abouttx/popcity12000.html

[2] ttp://texasalmanac.com/texas-towns/richland

[1]

[2]