Jump to content

Talk:Dim sum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateDim sum is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 31, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

White rice cake?

[edit]

A few times that I've gone for Dim Sum, I've been able to snag a dessert item, that is about 3/4" thick, sliced in triangular chunks about 2"x3". These are white, a bit rubbery, taste like rice and honey, are flat on the top, but have a not-quite-honeycomb lattice on the bottom. (And are delicious!!) I've asked what the name is, and I've forgotten the chinese name, but I was told the english translation is "Rice Cake" or "White Rice Cake". I came to this article to try to learn more about it (re-learn what its name is, so I can ask for it properly, or try to look for recipes....), but it's not here. :( Does anyone know what this dish is, and what it's (properly) called? And can it please get added to this article? It doesn't taste like coconut, so it's not coconut jelly. Thanks! 173.206.137.186 (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jin deui or Jian dui?

[edit]

The wonderful Sesame Ball is shown as Jin Deui here, but the link is to the article on Jian Dui! Not so much as a disambig! Is one of those the proper (transliterated) name... or maybe both? I think there are two fillings: red bean paste and lotus paste. Do the pastries have different names depending on the filling? Tzf (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lo Mai Ban? (Sticky Jin Deui)

[edit]

Another Xin Nian dish, with the center of jin deui (red bean paste usually) but the chewy dough is uncooked, sweet, and wrapped in a leaf like Lo Mai Gai. What is the correct name for this? Tzf (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please add the following topics

[edit]

https://redhousespice.com/mango-pancake/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.44.56 (talk) 04:14, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mango pancakes doesn't appear to be an existing article. It probably should be created before it is linked to on this page. Sakura CarteletTalk 04:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com.au/search?source=hp&ei=eCS3WoCyNIqI8wWehrCQBQ&q=%E6%A6%B4%E8%8E%B2%E9%85%A5&oq=%E6%A6%B4%E8%8E%B2%E9%85%A5&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3848.3848.0.5000.1.1.0.0.0.0.251.251.2-1.1.0....0...1.2.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.8r54wUSFqrs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.44.56 (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com.au/search?source=hp&ei=1Ce3Wpoqi6nxBeO_l8AG&q=durian+crisp+nosh&oq=durian+crisp+nosh&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i22i30k1.7998.7998.0.10252.1.1.0.0.0.0.18.18.1.1.0....0...1.2.64.psy-ab..0.1.17....0.lY1cVtUdTL0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.44.56 (talk) 04:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/皮蛋瘦肉粥 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.44.56 (talk) 05:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://kwgls.wordpress.com/2015/08/22/century-egg-pork-congee-皮蛋瘦肉粥)/


http://www.baike.com/wiki/皮蛋酥


https://www.google.com.au/search?ei=zLXFWuK3LYeS0gLMjLLICQ&q=%E7%BD%97%E6%B1%89%E6%96%8B%E8%85%90%E7%9A%AE%E5%8D%B7&oq=%E7%BD%97%E6%B1%89%E6%96%8B%E8%85%90%E7%9A%AE%E5%8D%B7&gs_l=psy-ab.3...160441.160852.0.162437.2.2.0.0.0.0.577.577.5-1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0....0.1KcjOO5_UVw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.180.131.20 (talk) 05:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


https://www.google.com.au/search?ei=dLjFWpD2LIH90wLbkJPYBg&q=%E7%85%8E%E9%85%BF%E8%8C%84%E5%AD%90+dim+sum&oq=%E7%85%8E%E9%85%BF%E8%8C%84%E5%AD%90+dim+sum&gs_l=psy-ab.3...20318.31702.0.32874.8.8.0.0.0.0.550.2348.2-2j1j2j1.6.0....0...1c.1j4.64.psy-ab..2.2.844...33i160k1.0.uVo3WX3IIQ8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.180.131.20 (talk) 05:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does the article include images that enhance understanding the topic?

[edit]

While the article does use some of the images to identity the food as well as some of the tea commonly used, much of the food in the article mentioned does not have an image to reference to. Jennil12988 (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Editing

[edit]

Submitted a request to the Guild of Copy Editors for Copy Editing in preparation for a Good Article Nomination. Hope people can help out on the feedback and move this towards a good article. Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing was completed on August 4, 2020. --Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 02:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions made based on previous feedback. Submitted a request to the Guild of Copy Editors for Copy Editing in preparation for a Good Article Nomination. Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will be copy editing this article. Edipio (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dim sum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]

Hi! Thanks for nominating this article. Sadly, I've had a read through, and I don't think I can support this article for promotion. Here's some issues that I picked up that are going to take a bit longer to fix than the normal GAN process. If you get the article passed this, please renominate:

On the plus side, the references look good, aside from "The Passionate Foodie", which is a blog. If you can work on the above, it'll be suitable for another nomination.

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

[edit]

Not Dim Sum

[edit]

The current version of the article has some items that are not really dim sum. How can one call congee “dim sum”? NOT every dish that one can order in a Chinese restaurant when go for “yum cha” can be called dim sum. This needs to be fixed. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some of the most obvious. [1] Those *are* Chinese food, but *not* dim sum. They can be added to other articles. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I don't have extreme objections to your edit, it does bring up a long term issue.
I have seen most (if not all) of those deleted dishes at many dim sum restaurants. So a long term question is how does one define "canonical dim sum" dishes, and according to what standard? Since dim sum is always evolving, and in most cases has had the most innovation and popularity by the Chinese diaspora in places actually outside of China, it may be more useful to label certain dishes as "core" and others as "also found in dim sum settings" rather than outright deleting them. - Fuzheado | Talk 14:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]