Jump to content

Talk:2004 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Waiting

[edit]

I'm going to have to wait for the end-of-year summaries to really flesh out this article. This basin just doesn't get the attention (and rightly so) that the Atlantic does. --Golbez 05:26, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)

I'm waiting for a freak hurricane to slam into Los Angeles or San Diego. That'd get some attention. -- Cyrius| 05:49, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
It's extremely unlikely that a hurricane would survive the crossing over the cold waters of the Pacific Current. However, in 1997, Hurricane Nora crossed over the Baja California peninsula, and into the Gulf of California, hitting the mouth of the Colorado River and traveling northward along it (the California/Arizona border), and hitting Yuma (well inland) as a tropical storm. Even after being downgraded to a depression, it downed hundreds of trees in southern Utah up around 10,000 feet (3000m) elevation (AMSL), because the top of the storm is going faster to begin with, and also spins down much more slowly because of the lack of friction with the land below.   –radiojon 00:45, 2004 Oct 13 (UTC)

A tropical storm made landfall in the Long Beach area on September 25, 1939. It killed 45 people. [1]

E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - Squawk Box 22:29, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Events

[edit]

I moved the events section to its own article. I agree with Tom, once the season is over, the events section is better off on its own page.

E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - Squawk Box 16:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Need more storms

[edit]

Back when I created this page, I was the only one doing most of the work, so I only noted, well, notable storms. The other Pacific articles, however, now have blurbs on every storm, making this article very deficient. Does anyone want to flesh it out? --Golbez 21:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to add tid-bits about the other storms...I also have some good pictures to use. Weatherman90 00:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three months later and still nothin... --Golbez 15:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2004 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2004 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 21:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Will do. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will continue tonight. I need to find something. YE Pacific Hurricane 22:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The writing is good, but there's a bunch of links needed for jagron and some stuff missing from the summary/predictions. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll address the rest of these comments this weekend. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. YE Pacific Hurricane 21:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will continue tonight. I need to find something. YE Pacific Hurricane 22:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The writing is good, but there's a bunch of links needed for jagron and some stuff missing from the summary/predictions. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll address the rest of these comments this weekend. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Isis

[edit]

Should Isis get an article because it was retired? Mitch199811 (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No because Isis was retired for political reasons after the 2010 Season, rather than because of the 2004 system. It is also worth noting that the system was your classic fish spinner.Jason Rees (talk) 19:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


While the storm did do some notable things, this article is quite small and I believe the entire story could be told in the season section. Noah, AATalk 14:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. ~ Sandy14156 (Talk ✉️) 21:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge. ZZZ'S 03:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing important or interesting happened with this tropical depression. No casualties and damages were reported, and it's not meteorologically significant. The content in this article can easily be summarised in the 2004 Pacific hurricane season and the size is significantly under 10,000 bytes. I couldn't find any academic research papers or journals on it. There was a merge proposal on the tropical depression's talk page, but it was indefinitely paused due to a moratorium. --ZZZ'S 19:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, doesn't appear to be any damage. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yeah I knew this would be coming eventually. The impact section (and the article as a whole) is so short and since there's no fatalities and damages, merging it is justified. ~ Sandy14156 (Talk ✉️) 18:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.