Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood poker

Hollywood poker

Advertising. Recent edits by folks other than the originator made it less like spam, but it's still an ad for an online gambling site. Cdc 00:55, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Comment. Both James Woods and Vince Van Patten have had direct links to this site added to them by the same contributor. JRM 01:06, 2004 Dec 12 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the two of them are actively promoting (and being promoted by) the gambling site. Woods sure has an effective PR agent. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:39, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 02:46, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Is it a real website? If so, then cleanup; if it's a hoax, then delete.
• Delete. Advertising, and I don't find it a particularly notable site, without further information to convince me otherwise. Katefan0 06:33, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Advertising, and this is an industry that really doesn't need or deserve page rank boosting. (Note: when you VfD one of these website pumps, be sure to nowiki it.) It's not the industry leader, and Wikipedia is not a web guide. Geogre 14:25, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Spam. How on earth did it manage to survive this long? [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 23:00, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Comment. Why would we delete this site? It simply states what it is, but that is just my opinion I guess. 01:06, 2004 Dec 12 (UTC)
  • The above comment is by 199.246.2.159 , who then proceeded to change Mikkalai's vote from "delete" to this comment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:21, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete, advert, and shenanigans. Tempshill 22:39, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)