Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject China/ZHCOTM/Removed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed nominations

[edit]

Sun Ke (Sun Fo)

[edit]

Nominated November 14, needs three votes by November 21

Support

  1. Jiang 11:12, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  2. Lowellian (talk)[[]] 01:22, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Sun Yat-sen's son was a major figure in the early Republic. We don't have much on him. --Jiang 11:12, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • I personally don't know much about him, but it's unfortunate that he only has this stub right now. Lowellian (talk)[[]] 01:22, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Nominated November 14, needs three votes by November 21

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 19:07, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 23:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. Yu Ninjie 07:41, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Comments


Nominated November 15, needs three votes by November 22

Support

  1. Yu Ninjie 07:50, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Kang Youwei was one of the most important thinkers and reformers of modern China. I'm surprised there's so little about him or his ideas. --Yu Ninjie 07:50, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Yuan Dynasty (Mongol Dynasty)

[edit]

Nominated November 15, needs three votes by November 22

Support

  1. [[User:Colipon|Colipon+(T)]]
  2. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 18:09, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 05:54, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • One of the most important historical periods in China and undoubtedly in the world is currently missing the whole of Yuan Dynasty history from Kublai Khan's reign to the end of the dynasty. I do thank Oldakquill greatly for improving this article from its old state. It is imperative that we continue the improvement of this article.
  • It's missing some stuff, but it's far from stubbish. The real stubs/nonexistent articles should be given priority.--Jiang 11:39, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Agreed; other articles need much more immediate work. Lowellian (talk)[[]] 04:13, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Nominated November 14, needs three votes by November 21

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 19:12, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Jiang 19:26, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. Yuje 23:21, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  4. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 23:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Comments


Nominated November 14, needs three votes by November 21

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 19:12, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Jiang 19:24, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 23:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  4. olivier 09:42, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
  5. [[User:Colipon|Colipon+(T)]] 05:11, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  6. J3ff 00:55, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  7. Nichalp
  8. Xingdong

Comments

  • There is a very well written, very informative Public Domain text at Library of Congress Country Studies dealing with Sino-Indian relations... I am going to wikify this text and include it under this name. Even though this may be percieved as going against COTW I feel it'd be stupid to not do so. We may decide to not have this topic as the COTW (remove your vote); or it maybe nice to have our first COTW developing an already-existing article. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 16:26, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • There is a current NPOV dispute at the related Sino-Indian War, which is now protected. You are invited to have a look and contribute on the relevant talk page. Thanks. olivier 08:57, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • Xingdong is interested in Sino-India relations. Areas of interest include, but not limited to, Sino-Indian War, McMahon Line, Simla Convention, etc.

Nominated November 15, needs three votes by November 22

Support

  1. olivier 09:42, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Yu Ninjie 10:04, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. JOHN COLLISON [ Ludraman] 15:48, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  4. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 18:09, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  5. J3ff 06:09, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  6. --Malbear 12:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • A massive topic, currently a subsutb. olivier 09:42, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

Nominated November 18, needs three votes by November 25

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 03:00, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Jiang 03:06, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  3. [[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 15:57, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  1. I'm a little skeptical about this, for the reason that I am concerned about us getting to the point that we have a Sino-xx articles for every country in the world. I am 100% behind articles like Sino-Indian, Sino-Korean, Sino-Japanese, Sino-Vietnamese, Sino-American, and Sino-Pakistani relations: these articles make sense because China has had a very long history of dealing with these nations and there's lots to say. With Sino-Afghan relations though, I'm skeptical: the two countries barely even share a border and I'm not sure there's enough of a historical relationship to justify an article. This is kind of a borderline case (sorry, couldn't resist making that bad pun, but I am serious about what I said above). Lowellian (talk)[[]] 04:12, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
I disagree. Take a look at [1][2][3][4][5]. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 06:41, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Nominated 22 November, needs three votes by 29 November

Support

Comments

  1. See some details at [6]. olivier 08:52, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

Nominated 25 November, needs three votes by 29 November

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 03:40, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Jiang 07:07, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Comments


Nominated December 2, needs three votes by December 6

Support

  1. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 05:52, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

Comments


Nominated December 13, needs three votes by December 21

Support

  1. Lowellian (talk)[[]] 07:10, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

Comments


Nominated December 22, needs three votes by December 29

Support

Comments


Nominated July 12 2011; remains for 3 months

Support:

  1. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It's just so very needy. Also, for the sake of discussion, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ten Thousand Miles of the Yangtze River failed becuase of a lack of placement, which came from the general disarry of the article. I'm not saying that I'm in this to get an FP star, although I would relist the image if the placement gets fixed, rather I'm saying that this is just so bad that it can't support images properly. That's pretty bad. I think this is an area I can do good work in. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Could use a big group effort, as the topic is quite broad and the quality of the article could be improved. Metal lunchbox (talk) 06:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:


Nominated July 12 2011;

Support:

  1. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:


Nominated September 10, 2012;


Nominated 9 August 2012;

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments


Nominated 29 July 2012 I am wondering if someone here would be interested in adding Chinese perspectives into the article of animal rights. I think current under representation of Chinese perspective in the article is unacceptable because vegetarianism, Buddhism, Taoism had long history in China. SSZvH7N5n8 (talk) 08:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nominated June 6, 2012, remains for three months

Support

Comments