Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 March 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 19

[edit]

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete.

  • 01:31, 21 Mar 2005 Academic Challenger deleted KNodwic ((nominated for VFD, votes 5-0 to delete in the first hour and the author also OKed deletion))

--Deathphoenix 15:07, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The fictional world created by a few Australian private school students, which exists nowhere but on their website and written down in exercise books. While such private fictional endeavors are fun, they aren't what Wikipedia is here to chronicle. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:43, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • It's probably designed to show off to classmates with the response 'freaks'. It isn't even complete, the bottom two sections have editing notes and that doesn't help it's case. Delete unless its from something notable such as a published book, which it doesn't appear to be if a film called "Attack of the Coke Machine" fictionally spawned from it. Hedley 03:03, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity - David Gerard 17:29, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity fiction -- Cyrius| 23:03, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity, nn. Or should I say studentfictionalworldcruft? vlad_mv 03:16, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The authors have blanked the page (leaving the deletion notice) and put on a note appologizing and requesting deletion, and since there are no votes to keep, I am going to delete it now. Academic Challenger 01:31, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete --Carnildo 08:09, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Strangely, I added an image to this page a while back and can't remember doing it at all. Either way, Zakir Raman: No Google hits. In Search Of The Everlasting: No Google hits. This article isn't notable, most likely a hoax and if that is the case vandalism of adding this person to George Harrison and other articles should be undone also. Hedley 03:51, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Confirmed fabrication of this article: Post on internet forum located here states "I added JonHawk's Zakir Raman (made up) and no-ones noticed it yet". I'm now in belief it is a speedy delete candidate. Hedley 03:58, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Speedy deleted as vandalism, given no corroborating evidence of his existence. -- Cyrius| 04:15, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete and recreate as redirect. —Korath (Talk) 15:20, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Advertisement. What's more, this page was deleted before and immediately recreated by the author. Kairos 05:38, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Then mark it {{deleteagain}}. —Korath (Talk) 05:50, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
    • Ah. Sorry. This is my first VfD. Kairos 06:00, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, record store ad. Megan1967 06:17, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Maybe a redirect to Leftoverture, the album by Kansas? DaveTheRed 06:21, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Speedy deleted and redirected. A redirect gives something to protect if it comes back again, which is a plus. -- Cyrius| 06:23, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. The article has been marked for pending deletion. sjorford →•← 10:12, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cannot verify the claims of notability made in this article (I seriously doubt he ever played with The Beatles and Led Zeppelin). Google is only showing up Wikipedia mirrors thus article fails to establish notability in accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines. No Allmusic.com entry. More than likely a hoax. JamesBurns 06:47, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Ha ha ha. Delete - David Gerard 17:31, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Let's BJAODN it. Radiant_* 18:55, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Hmm. It does sound like nonsense, and I can't verify it either. There's also a copy on simple:, and it looks like there was a copy on de: and eo: at one time (according to the history). And another user added him to the paradiddle article. So probably delete, but I'll also ask User:Zanimum what's going on... sjorford →•← 22:44, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, I'm sorry. Delete. I was essentially trying to show a friend how quickly Wikipedia deletes rubbish. When the community didn't delete the article, I decided to let it ride. Eventually, I simply forgot about it. I'm very sorry, and I promise to never do this sort of experiment again. I don't see why you'd even "BJAODN it", it's just an experiment that lasted well beyond itself. -- user:zanimum
    • I just tried to delete it myself, it said: "Can't delete this article because it contains new block-compressed revisions, which are not supported by the new selective undelete feature and could result in data loss if deletion and undeletion happened. This is a temporary situation which the developers are well aware of, and should be fixed within a month or two. Please mark the page for deletion, protect the page and wait for a software update to allow normal deletion. If there is an actual complaint from a copyright holder or other suitable legal complaint and they are unwilling to accept page blanking and protection as a temporary measure, please ask a developer for assistance." -- user:zanimum

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.