Jump to content

Talk:Muztagh Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Position

[edit]

Double check the coordinates for this mountain; Peakware site lists as 35.833 N, 76.3667 E. [1]. The coordinates quoted in the article appears to be that of Rakaposhi Mountain.

--smr 08:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

EverestNews.com's entry on the Mustagh Tower headlines the summit as being 7284. The text then describes a twin summit, with the West Summit being 7270m, while the East Summit was 7273m. Joe Brown said it was a 'surprise' when they found two summits on the first ascent in 1956. Joe Brown and Ian McNaught-Davies reached the lower (West) summit on 6 July 1956, but couldn't tell which of the two summits was higher. They abandoned an attempt to cross between the two summits. My understanding is that the second team from the 1956 expidition reached BOTH summits on 7 July 1956 in order to ensure that they had conclusively 'nailed it'.

The SECOND summit referred to in the Wiki entry relates to the NORTH-EAST RIDGE summit, which EverestNews.com reports as being 7180 (agrees with the Wiki entry) and was first climbed in 1984 by a Anglo-US team. My understanding is that the East and West Summits wouldn't normally count as 'separate summits', but the very close height and the question that arises as to 'who' reached the 'top' first has required some 'explanation'. The 'true' second summit is the 7180 peak on the NE Ridge. Tban 02:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took out most of the stuff about the multiple summits for now, since it wasn't properly sourced anyway, and what I see so far is contradictory. I will try to piece together what I have from the AAJ, Neate, and EverestNews.com. -- Spireguy (talk) 03:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sellas Photograph

[edit]
Muztagh Tower by Vittorio Sella 1909 (distance is about 35km)

Vittorio Sella took more than one pictures of Muztagh Tower during the 1909-expedition. I don't know, but I assume that the foto in the article (by Jan. 2014) might not be the one the mountaineerers were talking about. Maybe it was the one on the right. But there are even some more, see Category:Muztagh Tower on Commons. --Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muztagh Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]