Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Shorne and Fred Bauder/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or vote to abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority aye vote will be enacted.
  • Items that receive a majority nay vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority aye or nay vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.
  • Items that receive a majority abstentions will need to go through an amendment process and be re-voted on once.

Conditional votes for, against, or to abstain should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.

Proposed temporary orders

[edit]

1) {text of proposed orders}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:


Proposed principles

[edit]

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed principle}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

[edit]

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Proposed decision

[edit]

Remedies

[edit]

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Enforcement

[edit]

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed enforcement}


Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit]

General

[edit]

Motion to close

[edit]

Four Aye votes needed to close case

  1. Shorne has not edited in almost a month (and is currently banned and has promised not to return). As such, I move to close, subject to re-activiation should be return. →Raul654 01:02, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
  2. I agree. --mav 04:42, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  3. I hate to leave garbage for the next generation (I think reactivation likely), but if this is the will of the council, I will support it. :-) Jwrosenzweig 08:27, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  4. Aye. ➥the Epopt 16:28, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)