Jump to content

Talk:Killdozer (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I find it weird that anybody calls it "Killdozer" when it didn't kill or even injure anybody. Is this really a widespread name for the thing? Google doesn't show me much besides killdozer.us and a few blogs. Everyking 14:59, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I imagine that as this happened less than a month ago soon we can merge it into Marvin Heemeyer - its very topical in the United States - but is it encyclopedic? Secretlondon 15:02, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I agree. Merge with Heemeyer article and make this a rederction page for it. MathKnight 16:59, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Edited for over-use of the word "rampage".

Regarding this link: http://www.killdozer.us/ that anon-user added: It is some sort of a fan-site to Marvin Heemeyer's armored bulldozer.

The webmaster don't understand much about bulldozers.

  1. Marv DID NOT had a D9R model (the tracks are totally different), but an older (I guess a D9G or D9H) which is no more under production.
  2. They published a picture of an IDF armored bulldozer and captioned it a "D9R" although it is actually a D9N.

MathKnight 16:57, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I broke this article up into seperate pieces for each definition of Killdozer - the article needed to be cleaned up a bit. JesseG 05:33, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

A new one!

[edit]

Take a look: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8836881/Libya-rebels-build-huge-armoured-battering-ram.html 76.117.247.55 (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the word "killdozer" used in several contexts not listed here. The unifying concept is that they are all heavily armored bulldozers, designed for engineering and demolition in a combat zone. So I've added a "See Also" to armored bulldozers and combat engineering vehicles, which cover the general idea of improvised combat bulldozers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syd Midnight (talkcontribs) 04:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]