Talk:Fordham University
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Fordham University has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. An archive topic index is available here. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fordham University/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jzsj (talk · contribs) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I am in the process of reviewing this article. Jzsj (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexa-playjonimitchell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring over the description of the honors program
[edit]An unregistered editor has begun an edit war to insist that the description of this university's honors program include the phrase "a community of scholars for justice." The information is sourced to the honors program's own website but it strikes me as much more about advertising and promotion than about meaningful substance that is helpful for readers (without any examples and discussion, I don't even know what it's supposed to mean; it sounds a bit pretentious for a group of undergraduate students). It's certainly not something that an editor should edit war about. ElKevbo (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Not in an edit war, I only undid your edit once. The honors program recently revised its curriculum; it remains substantively the same, though its new official motto is “a community of scholars for justice.” Each course in the new program incorporates the concerns of diversity or justice in some substantive way, subject to the instructor’s discretion. In other words, the phrase conveys meaningful information concerning the program, and is not an empty motto, which is why I undid your edit. --69.121.96.126 (talk) 04:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
A bit over the top, don't you think?
[edit]Pictures of "significant" alumni and all the rest....
No, at least not compared to, for example, the Columbia University article. If I understand what this comment is trying to say.Indefatigable2 talk 19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Location of Good Article review
[edit]Drown Soda, was the GA review done on another talk page or work page? I ask because I don't see any commentary from the reviewer in the "GA Review" section transcluded above. If so, could you copy and paste it to this talk page with a link to where it came from? Rjjiii (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Rjjiii: It has been a number of years so I cannot recall much about this—I do see there is no GA review on the talk page, which is abnormal. I see in my personal talk page archive that there were a couple of posts made by the reviewer, but not a review proper(?) -Drown Soda (talk) 06:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- That's okay, thanks for checking. It's not uncommon for new reviewers to place reviews somewhere other than the review's page. Sadly, the reviewing editor has passed, so there's no telling. Take care, Rjjiii (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- High-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- GA-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles