User talk:UtherSRG

zOMG

		zOMG
		I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk

Happy holidays!

— mw (talk) (contribs) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Padshah UtherSRG 2024

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

• What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talk • contribs)

Question from Lyubomira95 on Wikipedia:Article wizard/HowToDiscloseCOI (11:06, 20 August 2024)

Hallo, can you help me to publish mu ne Article page. --Lyubomira95 (talk) 11:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@Lyubomira95: The article you have in your user space? As it stands it is not suitable. This is the English-language Wikipedia. We only accept articles written in English. If you wish to write in another language, you should go to that language's Wikipedia and do your work there. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, your userpage is not the correct space to make a draft. I have moved it to a more appropriate location: User:Lyubomira95/Lyrra. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Lawrence has been accepted

Brandon Lawrence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

CAM wikidata edits

	Amazing CAM contributor
	Thanks for adding to the wikidata for CAM clade and adding english entry to entry section. Have a good day :D! Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 22:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

TPO violations undone

It is not your decision to decide unilaterally what other editors may comment on, or where. Your reverts at User talk:BrownHairedGirl have been undone. If you believe that other editors are in violation of policy or guidelines in their comments, start by raising the issue at their Talk page, and if you don't receive satisfaction there, you can escalate to a centralized forum like WP:ANI. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mathglot: Should the "semi-retired" be taken down and the block notice restored? She's not semi-retired. She is indef blocked with TPA revoked. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

My understanding of TPO is that you may not take down the "semi-retired" because she wrote it and you didn't. As far as the block notice, I don't know who removed it, but if BHG was the one who did, that is within her rights per WP:OWNTALK. There are a limited number of notices that may *not* be removed from a UTP, such as a declined block appeal, but that doesn't appear to be the case here, so, the answer to the second question is, no, you should not restore the block notice. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

The Notice of the ArbCom case was archived. I think that more than enough arbs and admins watch the page, so if anyone sincerely had a problem with there not being a block notice to point at it would have been raised already. I'm sure I'm not the only editor old enough to remember Uther's behaviour on that talk page being "easy to interpret as "gravedancing" (even if intended otherwise)". DuncanHill (talk) 12:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Question from Lyubomira95 (07:42, 23 August 2024)

Can you tell me if everything is ok in the one I created Article --Lyubomira95 (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

For biographies of living people, every asserted fact needs to have a reference that passes WP:SIRS. If the fact isn't supported by such a reference, it must be removed. Your draft has many such facts. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

LOUTSOCK block of Atlas Þə Biologist

I am now curious, why was the account blocked for only one month, but the IP blocked for 3 years? I'm interested in learning about how block lengths are decided, is there a specific reason why the IP (well, technically the /64) was blocked for that long? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

There's really now set-in-stone rules or even set-in-mud guidance. I've looked at many IP and non-IP blocks over the years, and I haven't made heads or tails of it, other than generally escalating. In this case, I suspect the user would continue loutsocking when they can, so gave the most indef equivalent for the IP. I also expect the non-IP will soon escalate to indef. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the explanation! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)