Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page |
Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What not to list here[edit]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Instructions for listing files for discussion Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:
State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:
Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:
These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones. If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used. If you have general questions about a file and/or its copyright status, then please start a new thread at Media Copyright Questions. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Instructions for discussion participation[edit]
In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:
- Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
- Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
- Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use
Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.
Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons'''
, you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.
Instructions for closing discussions[edit]
Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.
Old discussions[edit]
The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:
June 25
File:200years.png
- File:200years.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brian.S.W (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The license plate contains graphic elements that are above the threshold of originality. It is not a U.S. government work as it is designed by the state of Louisiana, which does not automatically release its works into public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
For older nominations, see the archives.
Discussions approaching conclusion[edit]
Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.
June 26[edit]
File:112 Somerville Street, Andersons Bay, Dunedin.jpeg[edit]
- File:112 Somerville Street, Andersons Bay, Dunedin.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kiwiz1338 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This non-free image is not the subject of any significant sourced commentary in the article. In particular, there is nothing in the article that discusses the "environment that influenced Tarrant's thoughts" as claimed in the purpose. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 03:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFCC#8. We do not need a picture of the specific computer, and nothing about that fair use rationale suggests an encyclopedic purpose for this image. hinnk (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Ph Philippine Archipelago.png[edit]
- File:Ph Philippine Archipelago.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Toto11zi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No forseeable use, except to apparently nullify the content of the article Treaty of Washington (1900), especially in the context of Philippine President Bongbong Marcos mentioning this treaty as a strong basis for the territorial extent of the Philippines, inclusive of disputed areas (Spratlys and Scarboroughs), Tawi-Tawi, Sulu, and some outlying islands like Tubbataha and Cagayan de Sulu (now Mapun town), which were not included in the first treaty from 1898. Map misrepresents the legal extent of the Philippine territory as per the 1898, 1900, and 1930 treaties. Map is not usable and out of scope of Wikimedia Commons so do not transfer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
File:2023 ICC Women's T20 World Cup Asia Qualifier logo.png[edit]
- File:2023 ICC Women's T20 World Cup Asia Qualifier logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Crickdreamer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This looks to be a generic logo, not a logo specifically for the 2023 event, and thus violates WP:GETTY point 14 and WP:NFCC#8. Nothing on this logo is 2023 specific as it has no reference to the year 2023 on it. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- But it is the logo specific to the event, whether it states the year in the logo or not. The 2022 logo looks different, as far as I can tell, https://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/icc-world-cup-2022-schedule-get-full-womens-world-cup-schedule-indian-team-fixtures-date-result-here-1608020469-1 MüllerMarcus (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, it's a generic logo used in 2023 that could be used again should the ICC choose to, as nothing ties it to 2023 only (even the sponsor could be the same in 2025, so they could use this logo again). Many similar logos with no year references have been deleted too. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: We don't know what will happen in 2025 for sure (WP:CRYSTAL); If the same logo is used in 2025, then only we should delete it; otherwise it should be kept. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - As currntly used, the logo is for one specific year. That this may change in the future is speculative. No prejudice to a future nomination if it does get used for multiple years. -- Whpq (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Recent nominations[edit]
June 27[edit]
File:HippoCampus DemosII.jpg[edit]
- File:HippoCampus DemosII.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doomsdayer520 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
non-free image, article this was attached to (Demos II) was recently blanked and made into a redirect to Hippo Campus. Free Realist 9 (talk) 01:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
File:WKCF 2024.png[edit]
- File:WKCF 2024.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryan wiki channel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete: Higher quality version uploaded to Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- In my opinion, I saw the new logo on promos, as a top-of-the-hour bug, and as a screen bug. Ryan wiki channel (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Nobody Sees.ogg[edit]
- File:Nobody Sees.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rm w a vu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Hearing the sample over and over, I still don't see it contextually signifying the song or elements of it. Also, identifying ≠ signifying. George Ho (talk) 23:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
June 28[edit]
File:Rod Stewart - Your Song.png[edit]
- File:Rod Stewart - Your Song.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SnapSnap (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Cover art of modestly or less successful (or lesser known) cover recording, despite being charted, of an Elton John song. Unconvinced that the cover art improves understanding of the previously recorded song or the cover recording itself. Unconvinced that omitting this image would impact such understanding. May not contextually signify the song at all. George Ho (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep since this is a song cover of a notable cover version that if they were the original song would pass WP:GNG and WP:NSONG, charting on five national charts and two national subcharts, thus it an acceptable fair use and passes WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fastily 01:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: My understanding with respect to this type of non-free use is that it's allowed in cases where the cover version is deemed to be Wikipedia notable per WP:NSONG.Established practice when it comes to articles about songs seems to be to include all content related to cover versions of the song in the same article for encyclopedic purposes even in cases where a stand-alone article about a particular cover version could be written. Since the cover art for the cover version would be allowed for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article, it's also allowed to be used like it's being used here. Of course, that changes if the cover version is deemed to not meet NSONG. I believe this type of this has been previously discussed at WT:NFCC, but I just don't remember exactly when. Most likely there's relevant discussion related to it buried somewhere in the page's archives. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think you meant this discussion involving multiple book editions from 2019. Right? Honestly, that discussion is primarily about multiple editions, not about songs with multiple recordings. I'll seek others if the discussion wasn't the one. George Ho (talk) 03:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, re-reading the WP:NFC#CS, notability isn't mentioned there. The only area where the NFC mentions notability is the passage (WP:NFC#UUI) about non-free images of living persons notable for their early careers or appearances. IMO, a non-free content passing NFCC primarily based on the associated topic's notability would assume that the NFCC's standards for cover arts are somewhat... not as high as I would like, i.e. kinda low. However, I think the meaning is wrong, and I hope that's not what you meant, right? George Ho (talk) 03:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I mentioned NSONG and articles about songs in the "Covers for multiple editions" discussion you linked to above
and Masem seemed to be in agreement; however, I don't remember the first time I saw this being discussed at WT:NFCC. Maybe try adding a {{Please see}} template for this FFD to WT:NFCC? Someone who has been around since the early days of the NFCC might remember if this came up before.There is another non-free file for an Ellie Goulding cover version of "Your Song" also being used in that article, but you don't seem to have an issue with that file's non-free use. Is it because the section about that particular version is more developed? Is that the reason why you feel the Rod Stewart file is not OK, but the Ellie Goulding file is OK? That's seems to be more of an WP:ATD type of reason than a WP:NFCCP reason, at least it kind of does to me. Would more content being added to the section about the Rod Stewart cover version make the file's non-free use NFCC compliant? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC); edited 21:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I mentioned NSONG and articles about songs in the "Covers for multiple editions" discussion you linked to above
- The use of cover art for published works, without any direct discussion of the artwork itself that may merit its use, is meant to be used to represent marketing and branding implicitly for notable published works, per WP:NFCI#1. The Rod Stewart version lacks any critical commentary of the single itself (compared to the other cover version in that article), so there shouldn't be cover art. "Critical commentary" about the published work overlaps with notability considerably (since we're looking for secondary-type coverage which would satisfy both), so it could be seen to ask the question if that cover could be its own standalone article under the GNG (not NSONG in this case), which for the Steward cover clearly would not. — Masem (t) 12:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough and thank you for clarifying. My apologies if I misrepresented you in my earlier post; I've stricken that part of the post just in case. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Beit Jala Palestina 1937.png[edit]
- File:Beit Jala Palestina 1937.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlejandroFC (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is a photograph of a Palestinian family before moving to Peru, as used in the article Arab Peruvians. The article's description only mentions the family's departure to Peru, which makes the file an illustration without contextual significance.
Moreover, as a sizable community with over 10K population, we could have use other free files like images of mosques or community activities to replace this image. The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Update It appears that this anonymous image created in 1937 could be in public domain (50 years after publication) according to c:COM:Palestine and c:COM:Israel (the file is photographed in Beit Jala, which is in modern-day Palestinian Authority jurisdiction). This means the file would be in local public domain in 1987 (1937+50), and could catch up with the URAA date. Request changed to restore original version and move to Commons.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Autogolpe Lima 1992.jpg[edit]
- File:Autogolpe Lima 1992.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlejandroFC (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is an image showing the military occupying the Government Palace during the 1992 Peruvian self-coup from the AFP. As a self-coup with the aid of the military, the details of military deployment has been thoroughly mentioned in the article. The file's presence is not detrimental to the reader's understanding, and in fact it does not illustrate the point that Fujimori, with the aid of the military, liquidates the legislature with force. The file therefore fails WP:NFC#UUI and WP:NFCC#8, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Might be PD. Peru does not copyright simple photographs, but it is not clear how that is defined. See c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru#Simple photographs and note the bullet point: "In 2008 the court determined that press snapshots of sporting, political or weather events lack originality for lack of prior preparation in their production. See Resolution No 2521-2008/TPI-Indecopi, Agencia Efe S.A. v Las Rosas Editorial S.A.C." Wikiacc (¶) 00:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Though if the image was simultaneously published in the US (which it likely was, given the AFP credit), it is copyrighted in the US. So my vote is delete unless more information is provided. Wikiacc (¶) 23:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:EnterTheConqueringChickenReissueFront.jpg[edit]
- File:EnterTheConqueringChickenReissueFront.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Robertpaul826 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC as it's not used for critical commentary, necessary for understanding, or even discussed in any educational way. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Malayappa in Vasanthotsavam.jpg[edit]
- File:Malayappa in Vasanthotsavam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vimalkalyan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I could not find the license at source https://web.archive.org/web/20110709151610/http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2413061020079105973eOXeXZ — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 10:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Crainquebille1922.jpg[edit]
- File:Crainquebille1922.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Now available on Commons: c:File:Crainquebille (1922), affiche.jpg Yann (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: For future reference, files nominated for deletion for this reason often qualify for speedy deletion per WP:F8 and don't really need to be discussed here at FFD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
June 29[edit]
File:Plaza Miranda Mercury LED billboard (Quezon Blvd., Quiapo, Manila)(2017-12-31).jpg[edit]
- File:Plaza Miranda Mercury LED billboard (Quezon Blvd., Quiapo, Manila)(2017-12-31).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Patrickroque01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Possible derivative work problem: image is mainly focused on the illuminated billboard screen broadcasting the audio-visual advertising material belonging to Mercury Drug drugstore chain. In effect, becoming a "screenshot" of the advertising material. I previously raised this concern at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Archive/2024/June#Mercury Drug LED screen, with no response. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:CFL CAL Jersey 1989.png[edit]
- File:CFL CAL Jersey 1989.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cmm3 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Is this really non-free? I suggest it be relicensed as free but I'm not 100% sure so taking it to FFD. Jonteemil (talk) 16:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I created the file (Wasn't taken from anywhere), but I'm not sure what licence is best. Cmm3 (talk) 17:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I see. I'll let an admin decide but to me it seems {{PD-simple}} or {{PD-ineligible}} would be okay. Jonteemil (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
June 30[edit]
File:Drake - Scary Hours 3.png[edit]
- File:Drake - Scary Hours 3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lk95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC: not discussed critically or at all, not used to actually enhance understanding. In point of fact, there actually is a section about the album's artwork, but this doesn't discuss this cover at all. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Springfield Sign at Universal Studios Florida.jpeg[edit]
- File:Springfield Sign at Universal Studios Florida.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Windyshadow32 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Violation of freedom of panorama laws as a 2D work in the United States. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Caproni Ca 104.jpeg[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Uploader acknowledges file has no licensing information and requests deletion. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Caproni Ca 104.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sir MemeGod (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image was uploaded by Sir MemeGod under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license, but under the summary section they said "Author unknown, other info unknown". This is clearly not their own work, and with no information on at least where they found it, we have no reason to assume that this is not a copyrighted work. - ZLEA T\C 23:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as file uploader - I found it on Pintrest saying it was CC2.0, but after reviewing some image-related rules I realized that Pintrest is put under "unreliable sources", and it's honestly best to not take chances. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 23:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
July 1[edit]
File:(YouDriveMe)CrazyVideo.jpg[edit]
- File:(YouDriveMe)CrazyVideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Amylee-britney (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Merely identifies Britney Spears and two other females in waitress outfits. Doesn't contextually signify the whole song or the whole music video or text description that can be already understood without this image. Omission may not impact such understanding. George Ho (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Love Is Like an Itching in My Heart.ogg[edit]
- File:Love Is Like an Itching in My Heart.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FrickFrack (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Sample not yet proven contextually significant to the whole song or description already understood by readers without this file. No proof yet that omitting this file would affect such understanding. George Ho (talk) 09:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Alfie by Cilla Black UK single side-A.png[edit]
- File:Alfie by Cilla Black UK single side-A.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by George Ho (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I uploaded the image as "PD-ineligible-USonly". I've recently discussed at Commons (oldid) one of Parlophone Records's logos and the "45 R.P.M." one on the label, hoping that both of the logos are below the UK's originality standards. I guess I could be wrong, especially if one of the logos seen in the label is found ineligible for Commons transfer. George Ho (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Chitra Ramanathan.jpg[edit]
- File:Chitra Ramanathan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Userwiki88 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of artwork Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2[edit]
File:The Story of Ivy (UK cover).jpg[edit]
- File:The Story of Ivy (UK cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lord Cornwallis (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I history-split this from File:The Story of Ivy.jpg before realizing it was likely published in 1933 in the UK (not 1927 as it first seemed). Delete, then undelete in 2029 when the US copyright expires. Wikiacc (¶) 00:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Tamiya XStock BMAX1.jpg[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Tamiya XStock BMAX1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valenzuela400 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Microsoft DENSO1.jpg[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Microsoft DENSO1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valenzuela400 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Baron Viento1.jpg[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Baron Viento1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valenzuela400 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:KumbakonamCollege.jpg[edit]
- File:KumbakonamCollege.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ravichandar84 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
unused (personal?) image, no obvious encyclopedic use Jonteemil (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:GovernmentArtsCollege Kumbakonam.jpg[edit]
- File:GovernmentArtsCollege Kumbakonam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ravichandar84 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
unused (personal?) image, no obvious encyclopedic use Jonteemil (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Toa Payoh murder cat cage.jpg[edit]
- File:Toa Payoh murder cat cage.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NelsonLee20042020 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is an image showing the cat cage used to confine the victim of 2016 Toa Payoh child abuse case. While this forms one of the most heinous acts in the case, the file only shows a cat cage, and the rest of understanding rests on the caption.
(If the file showed how the victim barely fitted into the cage – maybe a CG demo – then in my opinion this relays more information that provides more contextual significance.)
To show how cramped was the victim's resting place, I believe it could have been replaced by a picture showing a similarly-sized cage from c:Category:Cat cages together with a modified description (e.g. "A cat cage. The victim was confined in a similar-sized cage until his death.
").
The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#1, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:The Penguin Times.jpg[edit]
- File:The Penguin Times.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Coin945 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Besides being "an image of a newspaper article or other publication that contains long legible sections of copyrighted text" (WP:NFC#UUI), there's nothing in the article that addresses the friendly relationship between players and developers in detail, so even a textual quote within the article would be unnecessary. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 13:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Venus-of-Schelklingen.jpg[edit]
- File:Venus-of-Schelklingen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wapondaponda (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
See also File talk:Venus-of-Schelklingen.jpg. Can a photo of a 40,000 year old relic really be copyrightable? Jonteemil (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's the photo that is copyrighted, surely, not the sculpture? Scientific photography like this takes considerable skill, enough to qualify as original. – Joe (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Santino Fontana.jpeg[edit]
- File:Santino Fontana.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gabecrawford (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Uploader has stated here that they don't actually own the copyright to this photo, as they originally claimed at upload. MrOllie (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:4chan logo.png[edit]
- File:4chan logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Goszei (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Currently tagged for F5 but I'm not sure it applies, since Commons has both c:File:4chan logo.svg and c:File:4chan Logo.png claiming that they don't meet the threshold of originality. The file doesn't qualify for F8 either, since the png is a different logo and the svg is a different file format, so I thought I'd bring it here. Nickps (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I removed the F5 tag. Please let me know if I wasn't supposed to. Nickps (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
July 3[edit]
[edit]
Today is July 3 2024. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 3 – (new nomination)
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===July 3===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.
The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.