This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
I have to concur with Hajor. But maybe putting it in the suggested format Hajor relayed wouldn't be a bad idea for the Popes of the Orthodox churches (Coptic and Greek) after Dioscorus I, Patriarch of Alexandria as he is the last patriarch both religions agree upon and would create the appropriate conformity of Patriarchs of Alexandria without titles already (i.e. Mark the Evangelist; Abraham the Syrian; Gregory of Cappadocia. As for the Eastern Rite church, their patriarch is an archbishop under the authority of Rome and therefore is in charge of a diocese rather than a religion and can't be called a pope. -Markio 16:25, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing that out; I must have read that convention at some point and subsequenty forgotten about it. It's clear, established, and avoids the ugly "(parenthetical disambiguations)" I described above. It makes it immediately apparent which tradition a given patriarch/pope belongs to; the pre-Chalcedon ones are all at Mark II of Alexandria, etc., without the prefixed flag, which is a useful way of indicating they belong to both (all 3) churches prior to the schism. Changing my vote accordingly. –Hajor 14:01, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'm new here (been a long time lurker in the shadows though), but I just read more about the naming conventions and looked more carefully at the sights including many of the saints. Therefore, I'm going to have to agree with Hajor again. It should remain as Pope Peter VII of Alexandria.
I hate mimicing people! -Markio 21:53 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved.violet/riga(t) 20:22, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)