Jump to content

Talk:Basil of Caesarea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeBasil of Caesarea was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 2, 2020, January 2, 2022, January 2, 2023, and January 2, 2024.

Old comments

[edit]

It is of great value to note that in addition to the others mentioned here, St Peter, Bishop of Sebaste, is the younger brother to St Basil. St Peter was present at the Second Ecumenical Council.

+What about creat a disambiguation page on Saint Basil? It would be aesthetically more pleasant.

Article improvement drive

[edit]

Let's see if we can expand and improve this article. I'll volunteer to improve the references, expand the biographical sections and add material on monasticism. We can use your help. Majoreditor (talk) 05:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work so far. I think the article has moved from start class to a weak "B". I'm going to upgade it. Let's keep going!
I cut some passive constructions, but don't have the time to do more.Jweaver28 (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace

[edit]

The statement "Basil was born into the wealthy family of Basil the Elder, a famous rhetor,[7] and Emmelia of Caesarea around 330 in Caesarea Mazaca in Cappadocia[8]" is absent from the indicated footnote i.e. Rousseau (1994), p. 1. Rousseau does not even mention Basil's birthplace. He simply says that "Basil belonged to a relatively prosperous and locally prominent family in Pontus". I am about to correct this and add other references that are more enlightening on this subject.--Dipa1965 (talk) 12:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basil of Caesarea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

death of Basil

[edit]

I am reading Retrieving Nicaea by Khaled Anatolios. On page 72 he says "... Basil of Caesarea apparently died of a heart attack after reading Eunomius's Apology", and references Philostorgius's Church History 3.15 and 8.12. I can't find any on-line text, and my local library doesn't have the work (I'm not an academic). It seems to me that a second-hand source (Anatolios) might not be what Wiki requires for a reference. Am I correct? Would I need to verify the actual text? or would I need to be able to link to an on-line text? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coptic?

[edit]

Why is his name given in Coptic? Everything would have been written in Greek in his day, and he was not Egyptian. in any case it appears as boxes in my screen. Shall I delete it?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]