User talk:Petwil

Welcome!

Hello, Petwil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Samw 20:44, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Epstein drag moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Epstein drag. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, I'm sorry, but that makes no sense. This is an important result in physics. Are you saying it's not a notable result? Petwil (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand the problem. Can you explain? Are you saying (1) it needs citations (which it already has), or (2) you're just saying that Epstein drag isn't an important topic that merits a page? It sounds like you are saying the latter. Am I incorrect? Just trying to understand what the problem is. Thanks. Petwil (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - are you saying it's not a notable topic b/c it doesn't have enough sources (it only has two)? I think if you look up that paper, you'll see it has been cited thousands of times. It's a landmark paper that was key, for example, to precise measurements of the charge of the electron in the Millikan oil-drop experiment. It's used all the time in examining the forces on so-called "dust" in dusty plasmas. The result is cited all over the places in basic physics texts. It's definitely a notable result. Confused. Petwil (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: cited *only* 1334 times. Not "thousands". :) Petwil (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epstein drag (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Epstein drag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Petwil! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epstein drag has been accepted

Epstein drag, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 04:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Petwil. Thank you for your work on Epstein drag. TechnoSquirrel69, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The subject in this article appears to be notable enough for an article, but the language is very technical in places, and borderline violates the neutral point of view policy in others, such as "The previous results were in error ... Epstein's work is viewed as definitive". Please take a look at the links I've provided and attempt to address some of these issues, and let me know if you have any questions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TechnoSquirrel69}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]