Talk:List of reported UFO sightings

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of reported UFO sightings article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 31 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Doggiewoggie, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2 October 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Show citation statistics for CS1 and CS2 citation elements in the article.
Stats: unnamed refs = 190; named refs = 22; self closed = 10. Click show for details.

reference info for List of reported UFO sightings

unnamed refs

190

named refs

22

self closed

10

cs1 refs

270

cs1 templates

273

rp templates

1

webarchive templates

4

use xxx dates

dmy

cs1|2 dmy dates

154

cs1|2 mdy dates

10

cs1|2 ymd dates

6

cs1|2 last/first

180

cs1|2 author

46

cs1|2 authors

1

List of cs1 templates

cite AV media (1)
Cite book (3)
cite book (38)
cite conference (1)
cite interview (1)
cite journal (10)
cite magazine (10)
cite news (76)
Cite news (8)
cite report (1)
cite thesis (1)
cite video (1)
cite web (104)
Cite web (18)

explanations

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Dave Stopera (2014-10-22). "21 Wikipedia Pages That Will Make It Impossible For You To Sleep". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 2014-10-22.

Redirects

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

The following articles have been deleted and now redirect here:

The following articles have been deleted completely but at one time redirected here:

Hopeh Incident [10]

As that changes other editors are welcome to ammend this post, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ(talk) 00:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Just wondering why the triangle in the image has 4 sides. lol. It looks more like the wedge shape of a hypersonic aircraft. VoidHalo (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photograph of a triangular object with the same outline as the lead's infographic — This model—created from styrofoam, wire, and lights to recreate the account of the photographer's partner—was subjected to rigorous photographic analysis by ufologists who believed (and may still believe) it to be genuine.[1]

I was attempting to capture the outline of a famous photograph, likely of a model, but presumed to be true for years by ufologists and the UK government. If that is overthinking how to make a triangle, and I have overthought some things before, then others are welcome to download and edit the SVG from the commons. Regards, Rjjiii (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know what photograph you're talking about. I was interested in UFOlogy as a kid in the 90's when that stuff was big, and no doubt saw it at some point. Probably multiple times. Either way, regardless of my joke, this was actually a well done photograph and a great contribution. At first glance, it could easily pass for a real UFO photograph (whether hoaxed or otherwise). VoidHalo (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fun, but indiscriminate

These additions (and similar ones) seem WP:INDISCRIMINATE and poorly sourced. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UAP

Per recent edits: How should this article (and other high-level UFO articles) present the term UAP? WP:RS seem to treat it largely as a synonym for UFO. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the existing definition is fine. It acknowledges the WP:RECENTISM of UAP, but stops short of treating it as The Superduper Latest Scientifical Official Update to "UFO". No need to cast aside the longstanding historical context of "UFO" in favor of the latest fad word. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]